Invention Machine Blog

Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Learn More

Innovation Software Tour

Request A Demo

Featured Event:

Register Here

Please join Invention Machine on Wed., May 23rd at 1PM EDT for a special webinar on "Powering Technology-Driven, Competitive-Driven,  and User-Driven Automotive Innovation".

Follow Us

describe the image  describe the image  describe the image  describe the image

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Great Innovation is Born Out of Collaboration

  
  
  

Earlier this month, the New York Times included an opinion piece on ‘The Rise of the New GroupThink’ written by Susan Cain, author of the forthcoming book Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking.

In the article, Cain speaks to the failure of brainstorming as a method for stimulating creativity and argues collaboration is not all it is hyped up to be:  “Research strongly suggests that people are more creative when they enjoy privacy and freedom from interruption. And the most spectacularly creative people in many fields are often introverted, according to studies by the psychologists Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Gregory Feist. They’re extroverted enough to exchange and advance ideas, but see themselves as independent and individualistic. They’re not joiners by nature.”

Many would argue that research has revealed just the opposite: great innovation and creativity is almost always born out of collaboration – out of knowledge derived from outside one’s experience, domain, company, etc.  and applied in a new way.

While brainstorming continues to be a common method to try and shake out the cobwebs and draw out new ideas from teams, in practice the outcome of brainstorming often falls short.    Psychological inertia, hidden agenda, lack of insight can stall creativity.

The reality is: brainstorming doesn’t create new ideas.  It simply helps people tap into what they have forgotten they know.  But to deem collaboration a failure as well is to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Collaboration is much more than simply getting people around a conference table to brainstorm. Collaboration - both passive and active - is about connecting innovation workers to the knowledge, people, insights and expertise they need in order to solve problems and uncover solutions.  Collaborating means making experience, best practices and lessons learned available to innovation practitioners and in the context of the problems they are trying to solve.

Too often, companies tend to build organizational silos that cut workers off from key information and from each other.  connecting people to knowledge

Innovation thrives when knowledge flows through the enterprise to the workers that need it.  This knowledge is often not documented, residing in the minds of the workers.  This is why it is essential to enable the connection of people to people based on what they know.  The more relevant knowledge they have access to, the more ease with which innovation practitioners can access that knowledge in a useful way, the more likely they are to make the connections that produce that moment of creative synthesis. The right collaboration framework can help make this happen. 

Conversely, the wrong framework can create frustration as workers feel it is difficult to connect and share knowledge and leverage that knowledge in their work.  Many employees find that tools are not compatible and that it is difficult to capture their collaborative exchanges in a meaningful way that can leveraged.

Collaborating and connecting innovation practitioners to the right knowledge at the right time is key to increasing the productivity of an organization’ brainstorming sessions - and to driving success across all innovation activities.  

Tags: 

Comments

I totally agree. Mr. de Bono already argued that creativity is higher by working individually instead of in group. But when accessing the right knowledge, every technician works individually and at the same time grabs the useful knowedge of others.
Posted @ Monday, January 23, 2012 12:09 PM by Jose M. Vicente Gomila
A key point for me in the NYT article was identification that one area where collaboration was successful was in 'Electronic Collaboration' where computer screens helped to subvert the sub-concious cues that can lead to groupthink. A problem can be posted for a group to access review and solve, but much of the work on the solution is done by individuals, and in the absence of the things that could pressure someone to conform to the ideas and trends of the current group.
Posted @ Monday, January 23, 2012 1:38 PM by Alex Saegert
Its a group discutiom that you can find the solution from voice and voiceless.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:44 PM by mbasa
I agree completely. Collaboration always has and always will be vital to commercial exploitation of individual ideas: innovation. Not just for individuals but for brands and organisations too. From promotional bundling to airline alliances, from exclusive content partners to critical suppliers - understanding that you need to collaborate has been at the heart of innovation. 
Posted @ Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:01 AM by Andrew Armour
Daniel Pink talks about the idea of symphonin thinking - the ability to gather and utilise a diversity of information, to find and build connections between various subjects, and finally to unite these singular sources into a unified whole.  
 
By creating tools to bring together the right information at the right time - and the ability to assimilate this information to create new products/services and solve problems will move us forward at an increasing rate.
Posted @ Sunday, February 05, 2012 12:33 PM by Maureen Metcalf
Collanovation is Purpose Driven Innovation; combining and leveraging on individual strengths with the INTENTION of producing a new product. 
 
For emphasis, Collaboration is joining forces which need not produce result; Collanovation is partnering with others to produce innovations 
 
Competition is a contest between individuals, groups, animals, etc. for territory, a niche, or a location of resources. It arises whenever at least two parties strive for a goal which cannot be shared. 
 
Business from living memory, has evolved and thrived on the idea that its your competitive superiority that enables you succeed in the market. 
 
I beg to differ and in the process submit that Competition is overrated! In comes Collanovate, a new way of doing business. 
 
Collanovate, as an option, is a strategy, an innovative synergy that comes out of collaboration. Collanovation is joining forces with others, leveraging on individual strengths to combine to produce a superior product. 
 
Collonovation is about leveraging on individual strengths and capabilities, while recognising that success may not be attainable alone. 
 
Collanovation is useful in new market entry, challenging market leaders, continuous improvement, growth strategy, etc. 
 
Collanovation is also the way to go for organisations to retain leadership position and remain at the cutting edge of innovation and delivery! 
 
Where applied, the Principles of Collanovation, where there are no single winners; everyone is a winner!
Posted @ Sunday, February 05, 2012 2:48 PM by Shola Ajani
This is not so much about creativity but about collaboration: check out the book "The Origins of Human Communications" by Dr. Michael Tomasello -- great research on why and how human began to communicate in a way that no other creature comes close to doing -- it is fascinating and should give rise to a different perspective of how to create a communications strategy.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:48 AM by Doug Poretz
Collaboration and cross funcional teams are key for organizations to sucede, not only to be innovative, but to be more efficcient and effective. It is also a great way to develop leadearship, generate synergies (internal and externals) and at the end probably the best way to generare organizational results.
Posted @ Friday, March 16, 2012 5:47 PM by Javier Martinez
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics